Will US or China win the next war? That’s the wrong question to ask
The latest Foreign Affairs magazine examines the US-China military and technological rivalry, framing the central issue as a clash of strategic philosophies. The US-led order, rooted in liberal realism, asserts the necessity of American primacy for global stability and the defense of democracy.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedThe latest Foreign Affairs magazine examines the US-China military and technological rivalry, framing the central issue as a clash of strategic philosophies. The US-led order, rooted in liberal realism, asserts the necessity of American primacy for global stability and the defense of democracy. Conversely, China's worldview has fueled its rise as a major power. Contributors, including lead essayist Paul Scharre, highlight how new technologies like drones, AI, and robotics challenge traditional US military dominance and enable asymmetric warfare by other states, potentially eroding American power. The article suggests that the question of who will win the next war is less important than understanding these underlying strategic differences.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
4 extractedThe Foreign Affairs magazine explores the US-China military and technological rivalry.
The US-China rivalry is at its core a clash of strategic philosophies.
New technologies like drones and AI challenge America's traditional power and enable asymmetric warfare.
The US-led order requires the US to maintain primacy for global stability, democracy defense, and power retention.