NEWSAR
Multi-perspective news intelligence
SRCAssociated Press (AP)
LANGEN
LEANCenter
WORDS969
ENT12
SUN · 2026-08-02 · 10:23 GMTBRIEF NSR-2026-0802-98354
News/Republicans want voters to elect Kansas Supreme Court justic…
NSR-2026-0802-98354News Report·EN·Political Strategy

Republicans want voters to elect Kansas Supreme Court justices and move court to the right

Kansas voters will decide whether to elect state Supreme Court justices instead of having the governor appoint them. This push, led by Republicans, stems from disagreements with court decisions on issues like abortion, school funding, and the death penalty.

Associated Press (AP)Filed 2026-08-02 · 10:23 GMTLean · CenterRead · 4 min
Republicans want voters to elect Kansas Supreme Court justices and move court to the right
Associated Press (AP)FIG 01
Reading time
4min
Word count
969words
Sources cited
3cited
Entities identified
12entities
Quality score
100%
§ 01

Briefing Summary

AI-generated
NEWSAR · AI

Kansas voters will decide whether to elect state Supreme Court justices instead of having the governor appoint them. This push, led by Republicans, stems from disagreements with court decisions on issues like abortion, school funding, and the death penalty. Supporters hope to elect conservative, anti-abortion justices, while opponents, including Governor Laura Kelly, express concerns about increased partisanship and expensive judicial elections. The debate is particularly heated following a 2022 vote that affirmed abortion rights, with significant campaign spending from both sides. Historically, Kansas elected its justices for nearly a century before moving to an appointment system in 1958.

Confidence 0.90Sources 3Claims 5Entities 12
§ 02

Article analysis

Model · rule-based
Framing
Political Strategy
Legal & Judicial
Tone
Measured
AI-assessed
CalmNeutralAlarmist
Factuality
0.70 / 1.00
Factual
LowHigh
Sources cited
3
Well sourced
FewMany
§ 03

Key claims

5 extracted
01

Kansas Senate President Ty Masterson called a district court decision reinstating a mail ballot grace period 'outrageous'.

quoteTy Masterson
Confidence
1.00
02

Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly opposes the measure, calling it frightening to make the judicial branch part of a dysfunctional system.

quoteLaura Kelly
Confidence
1.00
03

Kansas voters will decide whether to elect state Supreme Court justices rather than have the governor appoint them.

factual
Confidence
1.00
04

Republicans criticize rulings on education funding dating back to 2004, arguing elected justices won't force spending on schools.

quoteTy Masterson
Confidence
0.90
05

Supporters hope to elect at least four conservative, anti-abortion justices to the seven-member court by 2033 if the amendment passes.

prediction
Confidence
0.90
§ 04

Full report

4 min read · 969 words
A sign encourages voters to reject a proposal to change how Kanas Supreme Court justices are seated in Topeka, Kan., on Thursday, July 30, 2026. (AP Photo/John Hanna) By John Hanna Updated 12:01 PM MESZ, August 2, 2026 Add AP News on Google Add AP News as your preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. Share Share Facebook Copy Link copied Print Email X LinkedIn Bluesky Flipboard Pinterest Reddit Topeka, Kan. (AP) — Kansas voters will decide Tuesday whether to elect state Supreme Court justices rather than have the governor appoint them, a push from conservatives who have chafed for years over court decisions they disagreed with on issues such as abortion, school funding and the death penalty. If the constitutional amendment passes, supporters hope to elect at least four conservative, anti-abortion justices to the seven-member court by 2033. Kansas is considering the change amid concerns that increasingly contentious and expensive judicial elections in other states are making their courts more partisan and less independent. Spending in a single state Supreme Court race in Wisconsin last year topped $100 million. Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly, a term-limited Democrat who opposes the measure, said gerrymandering and dark money have put the Legislature out of step with the state and, “to think you can make the judicial branch a part of that dysfunctional system is frightening.” Republicans have a long list of rulings they question GOP lawmakers cite multiple rulings by Kansas courts over the past two decades as reasons for change. Most recently, a district court judge earlier this month reinstated a three-day grace period for voters to return mail ballots after Election Day, which GOP lawmakers had eliminated. Kansas Senate President Ty Masterson, seeking the Republican nomination for governor, called the decision “outrageous” and urged people to vote yes on the ballot question. The same judge — a finalist to fill the most recent Supreme Court vacancy — blocked enforcement of a 2025 law banning gender-affirming care for transgender minors. Masterson described him as “radical.” abortion rights are on the ballot in 4 states. Here’s what to know 1 MIN READ Supreme Court justices detail security risks and weigh in on ethics in rare congressional testimony 1 MIN READ Women are dying in Africa as US ramps up its global battle against abortion 1 MIN READ The list of rulings Republicans criticize also includes rulings on education funding back to 2004. Supreme Court decisions forced lawmakers to increase funding to comply with the state constitution. “If we elect our Supreme Court, they won’t force you to spend money on schools,” Masterson said in remarks in November to a conservative group, the Marion County Patriots for Liberty, the Marion County Record reported. Electing state Supreme Court justices gained currency among Republicans after a 2022 public vote affirming the high court’s landmark 2019 decision that Kansas’ bill of rights guarantees bodily autonomy and access to abortion. Total spending by both sides has exceeded $12 million. Legislators who worked to overturn the Supreme Court’s protections, including Masterson, helped write this year’s proposal. Seven weeks after that 2022 vote, Attorney General Kris Kobach, then a GOP candidate for the office, told a Republican club in Wichita that electing justices would “slowly and quietly” put anti-abortion justices on the high court. The vote-yes campaign’s biggest donor — providing $1.7 million toward the campaign’s $3.7 million in spending — is a Nashville-based nonprofit that supports Republican candidates, groups and causes. Kansans for Life, the state’s most influential anti-abortion group, has spent at least $87,000 over the past 11 days on mailers and texts. “Kansans can bring an end to this reign of abortion by voting ‘yes,’” Troy Newman, president of Operation Rescue, said in an editorial written by a staffer on the anti-abortion group’s website. Meanwhile, the national and state affiliates for abortion provider Planned Parenthood contributed another $1.6 million toward the vote-no campaign’s $8 million-plus in spending. Jamie Swan, an engineer and college teaching assistant who knocked on doors for abortion rights in 2022, is doing the same to try to halt the proposal. “I really believe that this is just a power grab,” she said. Backers of the Kansas proposal brush aside arguments that electing the justices will give wealthy donors control over the Supreme Court. “Globally and over history, even in its imperfection, the best system is democracy,” said Elizabeth Patton, state director of the low-tax, small-government group Americans for Prosperity, which has spent $935,000 to promote the vote-yes campaign. Twenty-two states elect their top court’s judges, eight in partisan races. Governors in 26 states appoint them. In South Carolina and Virginia, legislators pick the justices. Kansas elected justices for nearly 100 years before voters amended the state constitution in 1958. The governor now picks one of three finalists named by a nominating commission controlled by attorneys. Legislators have no role. A review of every state’s current and past constitutions shows that the last state to add an amendment like the one Kansas is contemplating was Mississippi in 1914. Since then, 18 states’ amendments went the opposite way. Voters weigh in every six years on whether a justice remains on the bench through a yes-or-no ballot question, but they’ve never booted a sitting justice. Conservatives say that means justices face no consequences for errant decisions. Retirements and deaths allowed the term-limited Kelly to appoint four of the current justices. Recently, she picked a district court judge who blocked enforcement of longstanding abortion restrictions in 2023. “We don’t have a good way to fight back,” said state Sen. Mike Thompson, a conservative Kansas City-area Republican, who backs the measure. John Hanna Hanna covers U.S. news, including politics and state government. He’s worked for AP in Topeka, Kansas, since 1986 and is a member of the Kansas Newspaper Hall of Fame. mailto
§ 05

Entities

12 identified
§ 06

Keywords & salience

10 terms
kansas supreme court
1.00
judicial elections
0.90
constitutional amendment
0.80
conservative push
0.70
abortion rights
0.60
death penalty
0.50
school funding
0.50
gender-affirming care
0.40
mail ballots
0.40
partisan courts
0.40
§ 07

Topic connections

Interactive graph
Network visualization showing 11 related topics
View Full Graph
Person Organization Location Event|Click node to navigate|Edge numbers = shared articles