NEWSAR
Multi-perspective news intelligence
SRCThe Guardian - World News
LANGEN
LEANCenter-Left
WORDS684
ENT12
MON · 2026-08-03 · 15:00 GMTBRIEF NSR-2026-0803-98696
News/Kmart sells out of low-cost rival to Meta camera glasses acr…
NSR-2026-0803-98696News Report·EN·Technology

Kmart sells out of low-cost rival to Meta camera glasses across Australia amid warnings of ‘privacy nightmare’

Kmart has sold out of its $89 Anko-branded smartglasses, which are a lower-cost alternative to Meta's camera glasses. Digital rights experts warn these devices pose a "privacy nightmare" as they can record video and capture images, potentially without consent.

Josh Taylor Technology reporterThe Guardian - World NewsFiled 2026-08-03 · 15:00 GMTLean · Center-LeftRead · 3 min
Kmart sells out of low-cost rival to Meta camera glasses across Australia amid warnings of ‘privacy nightmare’
The Guardian - World NewsFIG 01
Reading time
3min
Word count
684words
Sources cited
3cited
Entities identified
12entities
Quality score
100%
§ 01

Briefing Summary

AI-generated
NEWSAR · AI

Kmart has sold out of its $89 Anko-branded smartglasses, which are a lower-cost alternative to Meta's camera glasses. Digital rights experts warn these devices pose a "privacy nightmare" as they can record video and capture images, potentially without consent. The Anko glasses, which run on HeyCyan software, offer features like music playback and AI assistance, and are significantly cheaper than Meta's offerings. Privacy advocates have raised concerns about similar devices being used covertly to record people, leading to backlash and bans in some public spaces. The Australian Information Commissioner is monitoring community concerns regarding this technology. Kmart expects customers to use the product responsibly and in accordance with privacy laws.

Confidence 0.90Sources 3Claims 5Entities 12
§ 02

Article analysis

Model · rule-based
Framing
Technology
Human Rights
Tone
Mixed Tone
AI-assessed
CalmNeutralAlarmist
Factuality
0.70 / 1.00
Factual
LowHigh
Sources cited
3
Well sourced
FewMany
§ 03

Key claims

5 extracted
01

The Anko glasses are significantly cheaper than Meta Ray-Bans, costing $89 compared to Meta's starting price of $337.

factual
Confidence
1.00
02

Kmart has sold out of Anko-branded $89 camera glasses across Australia.

factual
Confidence
1.00
03

Australian privacy laws haven't kept up with technology changes regarding smartglasses with cameras.

quoteDigital Rights Watch
Confidence
0.90
04

Meta has faced pushback from privacy advocates, with some dubbing the glasses 'pervert glasses'.

factual
Confidence
0.90
05

The Anko glasses present a 'privacy nightmare' as people may be filmed without consent.

quoteDigital Rights Watch
Confidence
0.90
§ 04

Full report

3 min read · 684 words
Kmart has sold out of Anko-branded $89 camera glasses across Australia, which a digital rights expert says presents a “privacy nightmare” as people face being filmed without their consent.As of Monday, the clear-lens, black-rimmed glasses, which can capture images and record high-definition videos, were sold out at Kmart stores across Australia and online.The price point at $89 is significantly cheaper than the Meta Ray-Bans that the Anko brand glasses are styled on, which sell from $337.The Anko glasses run on HeyCyan software, which allows the wearer to play music, answer calls, use an AI assistant, and transfer photos and videos from the device.The software is used in a range of low-budget camera glasses, from online retailers including Amazon and Temu. Reddit users report that the software is sluggish compared to the software in the Meta Ray-Bans.Meta has faced significant pushback from privacy advocates since launching the glasses – which some people have dubbed “pervert glasses” – for their ability to record people in public.Meta’s glasses have a light on to indicate the wearer is recording, but there have been reports of users covertly recording in public, and reports that moderators employed by Meta review intimate footage from the glasses, including of people using the toilet and having sex.The company last month rolled out an update that disables the camera if the LED light is interfered with, and also reportedly began removing videos from its platform of wearers using the device to harass strangers in public.New York courts, the US air force and a hacker convention have all reportedly banned people from wearing the glasses.Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg wearing the Meta Ray-Ban glasses. Photograph: Carlos Barría/ReutersMeta has said it has sold more than 7m of its glasses worldwide, and has recruited celebrity Kylie Jenner for advertising to push the devices into the mainstream, but the Ray-Bans and the flood of cheap versions of the same technology have concerned privacy advocates.“Smartglasses with cameras are a privacy nightmare that illustrate how Australian privacy laws haven’t kept up with technology changes,” said Tom Sulston, head of policy at Digital Rights Watch.“We shouldn’t have elevated expectations of personal privacy when out in public, but we should have some.”Sulston said it was particularly problematic when in the hands of misogynist social media influencers who use the glasses to make content “of them harassing women – typically in places where we have higher expectations of more sensitive use of video cameras, like the beach”.A spokesperson for the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner said the privacy regulator was aware of the community concerns and was monitoring the rollout of the new technology.skip past newsletter promotionafter newsletter promotion“Organisations that collect, use or disclose personal information through products or services are subject to obligations under the act and the Australian Privacy Principles where the act applies,” the spokesperson said.“People concerned about being photographed or recorded by another individual may also wish to seek independent legal advice about whether other commonwealth, state or territory laws may be relevant in the circumstances.”A spokesperson for Kmart said the Anko glasses “are part of an established and increasingly mainstream category of wearable technology, with similar products available globally from major technology and eyewear brands”.“As with any device capable of recording images, we expect customers to use the product responsibly, respectfully and in accordance with applicable laws and community expectations around privacy.”Sulston said that due to the ongoing privacy issues, including how the collected data may be used by the companies producing the glasses, the social backlash would likely continue.“The best way to lose friends and alienate people will be to be a public specs offender.”One reviewer on TechRadar said of the Meta glasses this week that although it is his favourite tech of the year so far, he was afraid to wear them in public due to the growing backlash.“I haven’t been worried about going around wearing my Meta Ray-Ban and Oakley specs in the past, but with growing public anger over the way smart specs are being misused, I have a genuine concern someone will see me wearing them and act violently towards me,” he said.
§ 05

Entities

12 identified
§ 06

Keywords & salience

9 terms
privacy nightmare
1.00
camera glasses
1.00
kmart
0.90
meta
0.80
digital rights
0.70
surveillance
0.60
consumer technology
0.50
privacy laws
0.50
heycyan software
0.40
§ 07

Topic connections

Interactive graph
Network visualization showing 51 related topics
View Full Graph
Person Organization Location Event|Click node to navigate|Edge numbers = shared articles