Court panel declines to block Trump’s mail ballot order, but its status for midterms remains unclear
A federal appellate panel has declined to block President Trump's executive order concerning mail-in voting, upholding a lower court's decision that an injunction was premature until formal regulations were issued.
The story so far
- Jul 26
- Jul 27
- Jul 28
How outlets cover it
4 outletsNot rated on the left–right scale. It describes Western party politics and doesn’t fit state media or outlets outside that system, so we show ownership and country instead.
Open questions and key claims
State election officials argued Trump's order was ripe for abuse and could cause chaos.
Democratic officials argued Trump’s order was unconstitutional because states and Congress, not the president, have the authority to set election rules.
The administration argued the injunction is indefensible because agencies are still deliberating implementation, yet the court preemptively decided actions would be unlawful.
The Trump administration urged the Supreme Court to allow an executive order targeting mail-in voting.
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to allow restrictions on mail-in voting.
A lower court blocked mail-in ballot restrictions, ruling Trump lacked authority to change state election rules.
The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to allow an executive order targeting mail-in voting.
Trump ordered the government to create a 'state citizenship list' of eligible voters and deliver mail ballots only to people on that list.
Who and where
Related stories over time
same people and places- Jul 26 – Jul 28◆ This story
- Aug 22 – Sep 16 laterWhat to Know About Mail-In Voting for the 2026 Midterms43 articles · 6 outlets