As war engulfs
Iran, neighbouring states quietly prepare for a potential refugee exodus across already fragile borders.Iranians make their way after crossing into Turkiye at the Kapikoy border gate in the eastern Van province, Turkiye, March 3, 2026 [Dilara Senkaya/Reuters]Published On 17 Mar 2026Islamabad,
Pakistan — The war launched by the
United States and
Israel on
Iran has already killed more than 1,400 people, set off retaliatory attacks by
Tehran targeting Gulf nations and
Israel, and pushed global oil prices above $100 a barrel.Now, eighteen days into the conflict, aid agencies and countries neighbouring
Iran are increasingly concerned about a potential refugee crisis.Recommended Stories list of 4 itemslist 1 of 4‘We were just praying’: Pakistani students recount escape from war-hit Iranlist 2 of 4How
Iran’s women footballers took asylum in Australia and what happens nextlist 3 of 4Photos: People flee US-Israeli bombardment of Iranlist 4 of 4Up to 3.2 million people displaced across
Iran amid US-Israeli attacks: UNend of listThe United Nations refugee agency,
UNHCR, estimates that 3.2 million people have already been displaced in
Iran since US-Israeli strikes began on February 28. For now, the number of people physically crossing
Iran’s borders remains comparatively modest. But this is what could happen next, and has put
Iran’s neighbours on high alert.
Iran borders seven countries:
Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan,
Iraq,
Pakistan, Turkiye and
Turkmenistan.
Iraq shares the longest frontier, stretching for almost 1,600km (994 miles).Each of these states faces its own political pressures, economic limitations and security concerns.But pressure on the ground in
Iran is mounting. The country’s Red Crescent Society reports that more than 10,000 civilian sites have been damaged since the war began, including 65 schools and 32 medical facilities, while more than 1,400 people have been killed in the US-
Israel attacks. Strikes have hit residential areas in
Tehran, Shiraz and Isfahan.Meanwhile, commercial flights out of
Iran have been suspended as airspace is closed.
Eldaniz Gusseinov, head of research at the geopolitical advisory firm Nightingale International, noted that because strikes have so far been concentrated largely on
Tehran and western and southwestern
Iran, other parts of the country — especially provinces bordering
Turkmenistan,
Afghanistan and
Pakistan are absorbing much of the internal displacement.“If the strike pattern remains the same, internally displaced people inside
Iran will increasingly concentrate in provinces located near those states, creating the preconditions for cross-border movement,” the Almaty-based analyst told Al Jazeera.And things could get worse. If
Tehran, a city of about 10 million people, were to lose its electricity grid or water supply in a US-
Israel attack, for instance, residents could be forced to leave en masse.“Infrastructure destruction does not produce the gradual, manageable flows that the Syrian war initially generated. It produces sudden, massive displacement, driven by the collapse of basic urban services,” Gusseinov said.Turkiye fears repeat of Syrian migration crisisAmong
Iran’s neighbours, only Turkiye,
Iraq and
Pakistan have extensive experience of hosting large refugee populations.Imtiaz Baloch, an independent researcher focusing on conflicts in
Pakistan and Central Asia, said that if the crisis in
Iran deepens, many Iranians could seek refuge in neighbouring states, particularly
Iraq and Turkiye.Analysts say no country faces greater political exposure than Turkiye.“Turkiye is currently hosting many refugees from Syria and other countries. A new influx of Iranian migrants would likely intensify the humanitarian burden and create new challenges for both host countries and international relief agencies in the coming days,” Baloch said.Turkiye shares a 530km (329-mile) border with
Iran and allows visa-free entry for Iranian citizens. It already hosts the world’s largest refugee population, including roughly 3.6 million Syrians, and anti-immigrant sentiment has hardened within domestic politics over the past decade.Turkiye’s interior minister, Mustafa Çiftçi, said earlier in March that the government had prepared three contingency plans for the war in
Iran.The first involves intercepting migration flows within Iranian territory before they reach the border. The second proposes establishing buffer zones along the frontier. The third would allow refugees to enter Turkiye under controlled conditions as a last resort.Turkish authorities say they have already strengthened the border with
Iran, adding 380km (236 miles) of concrete wall, 203 optical towers and 43 observation posts – undertaken, according to a Turkish Ministry of National Defence statement issued in January, as the US was building up its armada in the Gulf late last year.“Although there is currently no mass migration detection at our borders, additional measures have been taken on the border line, and these measures will be implemented if needed,” the Defence Ministry stated on January 15.So far, this has not been necessary. According to Turkish government data on the movement of people from
Iran, 5,010 entered Turkiye from between March 1 and 3, while 5,495 exited.But Turkiye has felt the effects of the war’s spillover in other ways. On March 9, NATO confirmed it had intercepted an Iranian ballistic missile over Turkish airspace. The debris landed near Gaziantep, in the western-most part of the country, about 50km (31 miles) from the Syrian border.
Iran denied that it was behind the attack on Turkiye.Crisis on an unprecedented scale?What makes the current situation in
Iran particularly urgent is the scale of its population, say analysts.Syria had approximately 21 million people at the start of its civil war.
Iran has roughly 90 million. The Syrian conflict caused more than 13 million people to be displaced, including more than 6 million who fled the country.A proportionate displacement from
Iran would represent a humanitarian crisis with few modern parallels. To put it into perspective, if a country of 90 million experienced the exact same scale of crisis as Syria, nearly 56 million people would be forced to flee their homes, and nearly 26 million of them would become international refugees.Gusseinov said such a scale of displacement and the capacity of international aid agencies is “fundamentally mismatched”.Furthermore,
Iran itself hosts one of the world’s largest refugee populations: about 3.7 million displaced people, most of them from
Afghanistan.“Any mass displacement from
Iran, therefore, creates a dual crisis: Iranian civilians fleeing outward, and Afghan and Iraqi refugees who were already in
Iran being displaced a second time, or pushed back to countries that cannot absorb them,” he said.Hamid Shirmohammadzadeh, 35, who arrived in Turkiye from
Iran, shows his passport while staying at a hotel in Van province, Turkiye, March 5, 2026 [Dilara Senkaya/Reuters]
Iraq and the South Caucasus face difficult choicesAlthough most population movement is still taking place within
Iran rather than across its borders,
Iran’s neighbours do have cause for concern, analysts say.“
Iran’s neighbouring countries are already dealing with their own crises, which limits their ability to absorb a potential refugee influx. Countries such as Syria,
Iraq, Azerbaijan,
Pakistan, and
Afghanistan are facing varying degrees of economic, political, or security challenges. These internal pressures make it difficult for them to accommodate a large influx of refugees,” Gusseinov told Al Jazeera.
Iraq, which shares
Iran’s longest border, faces a particularly complex situation.The country is not only a potential destination for Iranian refugees, but has also been caught in military exchanges between Washington and
Tehran. US forces have targeted armed groups operating from Iraqi territory, while
Iran and pro-
Iran armed groups have struck – or attempted to strike – US military and diplomatic positions inside the country.The
UN’s International Organization for Migration says disruptions on the Iranian side of the border have led to the closure of several crossing points, although Iraqi crossings remain technically open. Meanwhile, the
UNHCR says it is monitoring developments closely, and that the Iraqi government would lead any emergency refugee response.The semi-autonomous Kurdish region of northern
Iraq, which, unlike the rest of the country, still allows visa-free entry for Iranian passport holders, adds another layer of complexity.The region hosts several Kurdish armed groups, some of which have reportedly been in discussions with Washington about receiving military support in return for joining the war against
Iran. The development has prompted
Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) to strike Kurdish positions inside Iraqi territory.Baghdad has publicly stated that it will not allow its territory to be used to infiltrate
Iran, but experts on the region say its ability to enforce the position is limited.Further north, the South Caucasus states of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia have each expressed concern while attempting to carefully balance relations with both Washington and
Tehran.Azerbaijan has closed its land borders to routine traffic, requiring government approval for any crossing, while Armenia’s border with
Iran, which is just 44km (27 miles) long, remains open.“Armenia is a small economy already absorbing Russian and Ukrainian migrants,” Gusseinov said.(Al Jazeera)
Pakistan and
Afghanistan confront overlapping crisesTo
Iran’s east lie
Pakistan and
Afghanistan, each grappling with existing refugee pressures.According to the
UNHCR, since October 2023, about 5.4 million Afghans have returned to
Afghanistan from
Iran and
Pakistan, many not by choice.Following the withdrawal of US troops from
Afghanistan and the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, a huge wave of Afghans sought refuge across the country’s borders, fearful of economic collapse and security threats.The
UN and international migration agencies estimate that between 1 and 1.5 million Afghans fled to
Iran in the immediate aftermath of the US withdrawal, pushing the total Afghan population in
Iran to upwards of 5 or 6 million.Concurrently, hundreds of thousands of newly displaced Afghans crossed into
Pakistan, joining a long-established refugee community there and swelling the total number of Afghans in the country to more than 3 million.In response to this influx and citing domestic economic and security pressures, both
Pakistan and
Iran initiated aggressive mass deportation campaigns, forcing millions back into
Afghanistan. Between late 2023 and the end of 2025, between 2.8 million and 3.5 million Afghans are thought to have been sent back.
Pakistan’s stringent repatriation plans pushed out more than 1.3 million people, while
Iran drastically accelerated its expulsions, deporting nearly 2 million individuals in 2025 alone.According to the
UNHCR, in 2026 so far, more than 232,500 Afghans have returned to their country, including 146,206 from
Pakistan and 86,253 from
Iran.The primary concern now is that the war in
Iran could accelerate these returns, pushing people into communities already struggling to cope and potentially triggering further onward migration. The
UNHCR has also warned that largescale and hurried returns of refugees could trigger further instability in the region.Further complicating the situation,
Pakistan and
Afghanistan have been engaged in fighting, as Islamabad claims that
Afghanistan is providing a safe haven to armed groups launching attacks at
Pakistan. Kabul has consistently denied the presence of any such groups on its soil.Another bout of hostilities in October 2025 led
Pakistan to close its borders with
Afghanistan. Since then,
Afghanistan’s trade and economic ties with
Iran have deepened.“Destabilisation of the Iranian economy, therefore, hits
Afghanistan through two channels simultaneously: reduced trade flows and refugee return surges,” Gusseinov said.Meanwhile,
Pakistan faces its own geographical and security challenges.The country’s border with
Iran runs through Balochistan, its largest but most volatile province, where separatist sentiment has simmered for decades. The province has seen an increasing number of attacks by armed groups seeking independence from
Pakistan. In February this year,
Pakistan’s military concluded a weeklong security operation in the province, and claimed it had killed 216 fighters in targeted offensives.While Balochistan’s provincial officials say they have sufficient resources to accommodate refugees if large numbers begin arriving across the southern border, researcher Baloch said the reality was more complicated. Any refugee crisis, he said, could make the situation in Balochistan difficult for Islamabad to manage.“Balochistan’s porous border is next to
Iran’s Sistan and Baluchestan province, a region that has historically been home to various separatist groups. Any significant influx of refugees across this border could impose additional security and economic costs on
Pakistan,” Baloch said.