US judge blocks Pentagon’s restrictions on press after New York Times lawsuit

A federal judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration’s restrictive Pentagon press access policy, which threatens journalists with being branded security risks if they seek information not authorized for public release.“Those who drafted the first amendment believed that the nation’s security requires a free press and an informed people and that such security is endangered by governmental suppression of political speech,” US district court judge Paul Friedman wrote in his opinion. “That principle has preserved the nation’s security for almost 250 years. It must not be abandoned now.”The lawsuit by the New York Times in the Washington DC federal court alleged that policy changes by the defense department last year gave it free rein to freeze out reporters and news outlets over coverage the department did not like, in violation of the constitution’s protections for free speech and due process.Donald Trump’s administration has denied that characterization and said the policy is reasonable and necessary to protect the military.Friedman, in ruling against the Pentagon policy, said while national security “must be protected”, it is also imperative that the public stay informed.“Especially in light of the country’s recent incursion into Venezuela and its ongoing war with Iran, it is more important than ever that the public have access to information from a variety of perspectives about what its government is doing”, Friedman wrote.The changes approved under Pete Hegseth in October state that journalists can be deemed security risks and have their press badges revoked if they solicit unauthorized military personnel to disclose classified, and in some cases unclassified, information.Of the 56 news outlets in the Pentagon-press-association" class="entity-link entity-organization" data-entity-id="47280" data-entity-type="organization">Pentagon Press Association, only one agreed to sign an acknowledgment of the new policy, according to the Times’s lawsuit. Reporters who did not sign surrendered their press passes.The Pentagon assembled a new press corps consisting of pro-Trump outlets and media personalities after the exodus of reporters, which the Times said was evidence that the policy is aimed at stifling unflattering coverage.The policy states that publishing sensitive information “is generally protected by the first amendment” but says soliciting that information could be considered by officials when determining whether a reporter poses a “security or safety risk”.In its lawsuit, the Times said the policy unlawfully restricts essential newsgathering techniques and gives the Pentagon “unfettered” discretion to revoke passes, permitting it to impose the type of “viewpoint-based” press restrictions forbidden by the constitution.Justice department lawyers acknowledged the policy was partly subjective but said press credentialing decisions were still governed by neutral, objective criteria. The government also said soliciting military personnel to commit a crime by disclosing unauthorized information was not legally protected speech. The policy change was criticized by journalism advocates, who called it another attack on the free press by Trump and his administration.“It’s shocking that this sweeping prior restraint was the official policy of our federal government and that Department of Justice lawyers had the nerve to argue that journalists asking questions of the government is criminal,” Seth Stern, the Freedom of the Press Foundation’s chief of advocacy, said in a statement on Friday. “It’s unfortunate that it took this long for the Pentagon’s ridiculous policy to be thrown in the trash.”“Americans deserve visibility into how their government is being run, and the actions the military is taking in their name and with their tax dollars,” New York Times spokesperson Charlie Statdlander said in a statement. “Today’s ruling reaffirms the right of the Times and other independent media to continue to ask questions on the public’s behalf.”The Associated Press has a pending lawsuit against Trump administration officials over its removal from the White House press corps after the news agency decided to continue using the Gulf of Mexico’s established name, while acknowledging Trump’s executive order calling on US institutions to refer to it as the Gulf of America.