NEWSAR
Multi-perspective news intelligence
SRCAl Jazeera
LANGEN
LEANCenter
WORDS1 128
ENT11
SUN · 2026-04-12 · 05:19 GMTBRIEF NSR-2026-0412-63984
News/Have US-Iran talks failed? Why no deal y/US and Iran fail to reach peace deal after marathon talks in…
NSR-2026-0412-63984News Report·EN·Diplomatic

US and Iran fail to reach peace deal after marathon talks in Pakistan

The United States and Iran concluded high-level talks in Islamabad, Pakistan on April 12, 2026, without reaching a peace deal. The 21-hour meeting, the highest-level between the two countries since 1979, ended with US Vice President JD Vance stating that Iran refused to accept US terms, specifically regarding a commitment to not develop nuclear weapons or the means to do so quickly.

Al JazeeraFiled 2026-04-12 · 05:19 GMTLean · CenterRead · 5 min
US and Iran fail to reach peace deal after marathon talks in Pakistan
Al JazeeraFIG 01
Reading time
5min
Word count
1 128words
Sources cited
5cited
Entities identified
11entities
Quality score
100%
§ 01

Briefing Summary

AI-generated
NEWSAR · AI

The United States and Iran concluded high-level talks in Islamabad, Pakistan on April 12, 2026, without reaching a peace deal. The 21-hour meeting, the highest-level between the two countries since 1979, ended with US Vice President JD Vance stating that Iran refused to accept US terms, specifically regarding a commitment to not develop nuclear weapons or the means to do so quickly. Iran's Foreign Ministry indicated that a deal was not expected at the first meeting. The US delegation, led by Vance, emphasized the need for a fundamental commitment from Iran on nuclear proliferation, while the talks also reportedly addressed issues related to the Strait of Hormuz. Despite the lack of immediate agreement, further negotiations may continue remotely.

Confidence 0.90Sources 5Claims 5Entities 11
§ 02

Article analysis

Model · rule-based
Framing
Diplomatic
National Security
Tone
Measured
AI-assessed
CalmNeutralAlarmist
Factuality
0.80 / 1.00
Factual
LowHigh
Sources cited
5
Well sourced
FewMany
§ 03

Key claims

5 extracted
01

No one had expected the talks with the US to reach an agreement in a single session.

quoteEsmaeil Baghaei
Confidence
1.00
02

The US needs to see a fundamental commitment from Iran not to develop nuclear weapons.

quoteJD Vance
Confidence
1.00
03

Iran chose not to accept US terms after 21 hours of negotiations.

quoteJD Vance
Confidence
1.00
04

The United States and Iran failed to reach a deal after talks in Islamabad.

factualAl Jazeera
Confidence
1.00
05

The main sticking points seem to be the Strait of Hormuz and the gaps in the nuclear issue.

quoteJohn Hendren
Confidence
0.80
§ 04

Full report

5 min read · 1 128 words
Vice President JD Vance says Iran chose not to accept US terms, while Iran says it did not expect a deal in the first meeting.US Vice President JD Vance boards Air Force Two following a meeting with representatives from Pakistan and Iran on April 12, 2026, in Islamabad, Pakistan [Jacquelyn Martin/Pool via Getty Images]Published On 12 Apr 2026The United States and Iran have failed to reach a deal after high-stakes talks in the Pakistani capital, with Vice President JD Vance saying Tehran refused to accept Washington’s terms after 21 hours of negotiations in Islamabad.“The bad news is that we have not reached an agreement, and I think that’s bad news for Iran much more than it’s bad news for the United States of America,” Vance, the head of the US delegation, told reporters shortly before he left Islamabad after the highest-level meeting between Washington and Tehran since the 1979 Islamic revolution.Recommended Stories list of 4 itemslist 1 of 4Netanyahu next to Middle East map: ‘We strangled them and have more to do’list 2 of 4Iran must not charge tolls in Strait of Hormuz, UN maritime chief sayslist 3 of 4US delegation leaves Pakistan without reaching Iran deallist 4 of 4Watch JD Vance’s full remarks after US-Iran talks end without dealend of listHe said Iran chose “not to accept our terms”, adding that the US needs to see a “fundamental commitment” from Tehran not to develop nuclear weapons.“We need to see an affirmative commitment that they will not seek a nuclear weapon, and they will not seek the tools that would enable them to quickly achieve a nuclear weapon,” Vance said.Al Jazeera’s John Hendren, reporting from Washington, DC, said the fact that President Donald Trump sent Vance showed the US was taking these talks seriously.“The fact that Vance left doesn’t necessarily mean that the talks are over,” he said, adding that the main sticking points seem to be the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran continues to control, and the gaps in the nuclear issue.“The US has been negotiating with Iran over time; those talks can continue remotely, and leaving those talks may simply be a hard stance,” the Al Jazeera correspondent added.Hendren said the US is demanding not just that Iran pledge that it will not develop nuclear weapons, but also that it will not even try to access those tools, adding that such gaps made the talks in the mid-2010s take years to negotiate.Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said on Sunday that no one had expected the talks with the US to reach an agreement in a single session.“Naturally, from the beginning, we should not have expected to reach an agreement in a single session. No one had such an expectation,” ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said, according to state broadcaster IRIB.He said Tehran was “confident that contacts between us and Pakistan, as well as our other friends in the region, will continue”.Al Jazeera’s Tohid Asadi, reporting from Tehran, said the Iranian side did not share information on the technicalities or other details pertaining to the points of controversy in the talks.“Previously, the domain of the talks between Washington and Iran was concentrated upon the nuclear dossier and stockpile of highly enriched uranium, and that was a matter of controversy in the previous rounds of negotiations,” he said.“But this time, we’re dealing with a rather comprehensive approach when it comes to other issues; and obviously, with that comprehensiveness comes other controversial issues,” said the Al Jazeera correspondent, adding that rival sides are looking to address many subjects from the Strait of Hormuz to security assurances.As well as the release of frozen assets abroad, Tehran is demanding control of the Strait of Hormuz, payment of war reparations, and a ceasefire across the region, including in Lebanon, according to Iranian state TV and officials.However, US ally Israel has refused to stop its brutal offensive against the Hezbollah group in Lebanon. Tehran says the ceasefire agreed last week includes the war in Lebanon, but the US and Israel have both rejected it. The initial post by Pakistani Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif announcing the ceasefire deal included Lebanon.As the talks were under way in Islamabad, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel’s military campaign against Iran was not over. “Israel under my leadership will continue to fight Iran’s terror regime and its proxies,” he said in a post on X.Netanyahu also said Israel is seeking a deal with Lebanon. Reports say Yechiel Leiter, the Israeli ambassador to the US, has spoken to the Lebanese envoy in Washington, DC, for the first time. In a statement, Leiter said Israel would not accept a ceasefire with Hezbollah.Call for continued truceMeanwhile, Pakistan has called on the US and Iran to uphold their commitment to the ceasefire and continue efforts to achieve a durable peace.“On behalf of Pakistan, I would like to express gratitude to the two sides for appreciating Pakistan’s efforts to achieve a ceasefire and its mediator role. We hope that the two sides continue with a positive spirit to achieve durable peace and prosperity for the entire region and beyond,” Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said.Al Jazeera’s Osama Bin Javaid, reporting from Islamabad, said that in the framework proposed by Iran before the talks, there was no mention of a complete surrender of nuclear ambitions.“But what the US is essentially asking Iran now is that they give up their right to any nuclear programme, even for medical purposes,” he said.“There is a sea of mistrust that they are trying to build bridges over, and statements like this and leaving the negotiations with an ultimatum are not going to help bridge those divides,” he said.The US and Israel launched a war on Iran on February 28 that expanded to the wider Middle East region, with Tehran carrying out retaliatory attacks on Israel and neighbouring Gulf countries hosting US assets. More than 2,000 people were killed, and military and civilian areas were damaged in the US-Israeli attacks on Iran.The war began despite several rounds of talks between Washington and Tehran. Oman, the mediator, said the war started despite a deal “within reach”. Experts have said the war violated international laws. A landmark nuclear deal signed between the US and Iran in 2015 was scrapped during Trump’s first term as president.The war also caused a global energy crisis after Iran put a chokehold on the Strait of Hormuz, through which some 20 percent of the world’s oil and gas exports pass.The US delegation, led by Vance, and the Iranian delegation, led by Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, had discussed how to advance a ceasefire already threatened by deep disagreements and Israel’s continued attacks against the Lebanese group Hezbollah.Israeli strikes have continued across southern Lebanon, with at least six people killed in the Tyre district in the latest attack.
§ 05

Entities

11 identified
§ 06

Keywords & salience

7 terms
us-iran talks
1.00
peace deal
0.80
nuclear weapons
0.70
negotiations
0.60
jd vance
0.50
strait of hormuz
0.50
islamabad
0.40
§ 07

Topic connections

Interactive graph
Network visualization showing 51 related topics
View Full Graph
Person Organization Location Event|Click node to navigate|Edge numbers = shared articles