As
elections near,
Israel’s PM finds himself squeezed between his voters, his allies, and his opponents.US President
Donald Trump points his finger towards Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu as they shake hands during a press conference after meeting at Trump’s
Mar-a-Lago club in Florida [File: Jonathan Ernst/Reuters]Published On 10 Jun 2026The
ceasefire between the
United States,
Israel and
Iran that began on April 8 is balanced, by all accounts, on a knife’s edge.Over the weekend,
Iran and
Israel both exchanged fire, only halting after the intervention of US President
Donald Trump on Monday. However, while that round of violence may have paused after Trump called on both sides to “stop shooting”,
Israel’s strikes on southern
Lebanon – whose cessation is one of
Iran’s key conditions for any agreement – continue. And
Iran and the US have also exchanged attacks, with Trump threatening to restart full-scale conflict.Recommended Stories list of 4 itemslist 1 of 4Israel’s strikes on
Iran expose Trump’s failure to restrain Netanyahulist 2 of 4Iran and
Israel bomb each other: Is the
ceasefire over?list 3 of 4How
Lebanon became the breaking point for the
Iran war ceasefirelist 4 of 4Trump warns Netanyahu: ‘You’ll be on your own’ if attacks on
Iran continueend of listFor
Israel’s Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu, it had all appeared so much simpler when the US and
Israel launched the
war on
Iran. After years of reported attempts, he had finally persuaded a US president to join him in attacking regional nemesis
Iran, and had launched widespread attacks on neighbouring
Lebanon.Both attacks provided a rare moment of unity for both the Israeli public and the country’s politicians, who ignored the mounting death toll and united behind Netanyahu in cheering on the perceived existential battle that, for decades, prominent politicians and media voices had told them was inevitable.Three months later, with Israeli
elections looming, the position is very different. Rather than the swift victory reportedly promised to Trump by Netanyahu, the US president finds himself enmeshed in precisely the kind of expensive and costly “forever
war” he campaigned against.
Israel and Netanyahu are caught between a
war in
Lebanon that domestic audiences continue to thirst for, and an ally in the US that needs it to halt to broker a desperately needed truce with
Iran.“He’s [Netanyahu] in a major bind, both political and diplomatic,” Alon Pinkas, a former Israeli ambassador and consul general in New York, told Al Jazeera, outlining what he described as the political cost to Netanyahu of three “failed” wars: in Gaza, where Hamas retains control, in
Lebanon, where – despite the prime minister’s promises – Hezbollah has yet to be eliminated, and in
Iran.“Diplomatically,
Israel is isolated, and perceptions of it are negative,” Pinkas said.The Lebanese angleThe latest flare-up between
Iran and
Israel had been prompted by a Sunday night strike by
Israel, not on
Iran, but on the Lebanese capital, Beirut.
Iran has insisted that any agreement with the US to end the regional conflict must include a
ceasefire between
Israel and the pro-
Iran Hezbollah. At the same time,
Iran has reiterated its backing for its Lebanese ally and called on
Israel to pull its forces out of southern
Lebanon, highlighting the obstacles facing efforts to secure a broader US-
Iran deal.“This
war will end only when it ends in
Lebanon, as well,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said earlier this week.However, that might not be so simple. For years, Israeli politicians have cast both
Iran and Hezbollah as fundamental threats to
Israel’s security.Smoke and debris rise following an Israeli air strike in Tyre on June 9, 2026 [AFP]A poll conducted by the Israeli Democracy Institute in April, shortly after the first
ceasefire between
Iran and the US was announced, showed an overwhelming number of Israelis urging their country’s
war on
Lebanon to continue, whatever the US position.Past indications that Netanyahu may have been prioritising US concerns above the victory he had promised Israelis have provided his political opponents with new ammunition.Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett blasted Netanyahu at the end of May, as he prepares his own bid for power. “The government is returning us to the contemptible policy of containment and normalising an intolerable and unacceptable situation,” Bennett said, adding, “Dahiyeh [Beirut’s southern suburbs] must tremble until security returns to the north,” in a clear threat to the southern suburb of Beirut, which
Israel considers a Hezbollah stronghold.“
Israel is not a protectorate,” said Bennett’s ally Yair Lapid, referring to US influence over Israeli policy, stressing “responsibility for Israeli citizens’ security lies only with the Israeli government”.Little remains of Netanyahu’s initial pledge of “total victory” over
Israel’s enemies, all of whom are still standing, Ahron Bregman, a senior teaching fellow at the Department for
war Studies at King’s College London, said.“
Lebanon proves itself, yet again, to be a trap for the Israelis,” he continued, referencing
Israel’s previous invasions of
Lebanon, all of which have ended in its withdrawal and defeat. “It would be difficult for Netanyahu to get the troops out of
Lebanon now,” he said, “and more difficult to bomb Beirut, as
Iran is likely to bomb
Israel”, with
Israel finding itself once more trapped, he concluded.ElectionsSurveys from northern
Israel – most at risk of attack from
Lebanon – show plunging support for Netanyahu, while across the country, some polls show the broad political bloc that simply identifies itself as “anti-Netanyahu” to be taking a lead before
elections scheduled for later this year.“Electorally, he has nothing to run on,” Pinkas said of Netanyahu’s chances in the upcoming vote, which must be held before the end of October. “He failed on October 7, 2023 [the Hamas-led attack on
Israel] despite self-ordaining himself as the greatest anti-terror [leader], and he failed on
Iran despite a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity with the US on his side,” Pinkas said, adding that the corruption trial that Netanyahu finds himself embroiled in also poses a threat to the Israeli prime minister.“Most wars begin with a wave of popularity and promises that they’ll achieve security for generations, before becoming bogged down in quagmires and confusion,” Chatham House’s Yossi Mekelberg said of where
Israel now finds itself.“Historically,
Israel managed to maintain popularity for its wars only when it fought short wars. Now it finds itself fighting on multiple fronts,” Mekelberg added, pointing to internal strains prompted by more than two and a half years of conflict, in a society already fractured by multiple wars, adding that he saw little good emanating from any of the fights.