EXPLAINERWith the war in its fourth week, the Trump administration sends contradictory messages on how to proceed.A mourner holds a picture of Iranian Supreme Leader
Mojtaba Khamenei in
Tehran on March 18, 2026, during the funeral of
Iran's security chief
Ali Larijani and
Gholamreza Soleimani, commander of the paramilitary Basij forces, who were killed in Israeli attacks [AFP]Published On 22 Mar 2026As the
United States-Israeli war on
Iran enters its fourth week, the conflict seems to have escalated beyond President
Donald Trump’s control.The Iranian government has been able to endure the killings of its top political and military leaders and has launched retaliatory attacks on
Israel and Gulf countries despite weeks of air strikes.Recommended Stories list of 4 itemslist 1 of 4Iran war: What’s happening on day 23 of US-
Israel attacks?list 2 of 4Why the world should worry about
Israel’s nuclear doctrinelist 3 of 4Did
Iran launch missiles at US-UK base on Diego Garcia? Here’s what to knowlist 4 of 4Hezbollah attack kills one in north
Israel as assault on Lebanon continuesend of listTehran has also been able to impose a de facto blockade of the
Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway through which a fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas supplies pass, sending oil prices soaring. Analysts said the conflict risks unleashing a global recession. And that has put pressure on Trump, prompting his administration to allow the sale of sanctioned Russian oil to try to ease the energy crisis and pressure allies to police the strait, so far unsuccessfully.Trump’s response in how to deal with the situation has been anything but coherent.On Saturday, Trump upped the ante, issuing a threat to “obliterate”
Iran’s power plants if
Tehran does not reopen the
Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours. This came a day after he said the US was “winding down” its military operations in
Iran.Analysts said Trump launched the war without a clear goal and misjudged how
Tehran would respond. The conflict has expanded across the Middle East.So is Trump looking to exit the war – or escalate it?From left, US Secretary of State
Marco Rubio, President
Donald Trump and Defense Secretary
Pete Hegseth attend a cabinet meeting at the White House [File: Evan Vucci/AP]Trump’s mixed messaging on the
Iran warHere’s a brief look at the changing statements from Washington:Is the war winding up or widening?While one statement from Trump signalled that the US is considering “winding down” the war on
Iran, another one indicated that the conflict would widen in the coming days.On Saturday, Trump posted on his Truth Social platform that Washington was “very close to meeting our objectives as we consider winding down our great Military efforts in the Middle East with respect to the Terrorist Regime of
Iran”.Trump listed the goals of the war as: completely degrading
Iran’s missile capability, destroying its defence industrial base, eliminating the Iranian navy and air force, never allowing
Iran to get even close to having nuclear weapons, protecting Middle Eastern allies, and guarding and policing the
Strait of Hormuz.Both Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have claimed repeatedly in the past few days that Iranian military capabilities have been “completely destroyed” even as
Tehran continues to retaliate against
Israel and strike countries in the region.US military officials said they have carried out heavy bombardments of
Iran’s coast, including with bunker buster bombs, but still have not been able to limit
Tehran’s capacity to disrupt the
Strait of Hormuz.On Saturday, Trump said the US “has blown
Iran off of the map” and insisted that he has “met my own goals … and weeks ahead of schedule!” He also reiterated that
Iran’s “leadership is gone, their navy and air force are dead, they have absolutely no defense, and they want to make a deal”.Iranian leaders have consistently denied reaching out to the US with a ceasefire offer.Just an hour later, Trump returned to his Truth Social platform with a warning for
Iran.“If
Iran doesn’t FULLY OPEN, WITHOUT THREAT, the
Strait of Hormuz, within 48 HOURS from this exact point in time, the
United States of America will hit and obliterate their various POWER PLANTS, STARTING WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST!” Trump wrote.
Iran has since responded by saying it will hit energy sites across the Middle East if its power facilities are targeted. It has already fired hundreds of missiles and drones on Gulf countries, targeting US assets as well as energy facilities.Between Trump’s claims to be “winding down” operations and upping the ante later, his administration announced it is sending three more warships to the Middle East with about 2,500 additional Marines.The US military said about 50,000 military personnel are already deployed for the war against
Iran.(Al Jazeera)When will the war on
Iran end?That has been among the foremost questions posed to US officials, including Trump, since the war on
Iran was launched on February 28.The next day, Trump told the Daily Mail that “it will be four weeks or so. It’s always been about a four-week process.” A day later, Trump said at the White House: “We projected four to five weeks, but we have capability to go far longer than that.”On March 8, Defense Secretary
Pete Hegseth told the CBS TV network’s 60 Minutes programme: “This is only just the beginning.” The next day, the US president told the same channel that he thinks “the war is very complete, pretty much.” And the US military operation was “way ahead of schedule”.Then, on March 9, Trump said one could say the war is “both complete and just beginning”. Later the same day, the president said: “We’ve already won in many ways, but we haven’t won enough” and promised to go further and harsher against
Iran.On March 11, Trump said: “We don’t want to leave early, do we? We’ve got to finish the job.”Why did US and
Israel launch strikes on
Iran?Responses to this question are perhaps the most telling about US posturing in the war against
Iran.On March 2, Hegseth said the attacks were aimed at ending “47 long years” of war by “the expansionist and Islamist regime in
Tehran” and were launched because
Iran refused to negotiate with the US.Hours later,
Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, told reporters the US knew
Israel was about to strike
Iran, adding that the Trump administration believed the US needed to launch a pre-emptive strike before
Iran’s retaliation potentially targeted US forces. “We went proactively in a defensive way to prevent them from inflicting higher damage,” he said.This sparked a massive row in Washington with critics saying
Israel had forced the US into war with
Iran. Soon Trump rebutted his top diplomat, saying: “They [
Iran] were going to attack. If we didn’t do it, they were going to attack first. … So if anything, I might have forced
Israel’s hand.”The next day, the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, concluded that Trump just had a “good feeling” that
Iran would strike so Washington attacked
Tehran.The launch of the war came as Washington and
Tehran were scheduled to meet for another round of talks that were started late last year. Before the war, their Omani mediator said a deal was “within reach”.The US and Israeli assertion that
Tehran was on the verge of making a nuclear bomb has not been backed up by the United Nations nuclear watchdog. Last week, US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard also told Congress that
Iran was not in a position to make an atomic bomb.Some analysts said the Trump administration was convinced to go to war by Netanyahu, who has been seeking US military intervention in
Iran for decades. They said Trump was buoyed by a swift US military operation in Venezuela and did not think through
Iran’s strengths before going into the war. In January, the US military abducted President Nicolas Maduro in a military operation in Caracas that took two and a half hours.US President
Donald Trump, left, greets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House on September 29, 2025, on the fourth of his six visits to the US during Trump’s second term, which began in January 2025 [Alex Brandon/AP]What does the conflicting messaging mean for US strategy?Analysts said the moving goalposts in the
Iran war show the policy limits of the current Trump administration as well as its strategy, to some extent, of keeping off-ramps available.