China has emerged as the sole winner in
Asia from the
Strait of Hormuz crisis, according to a report published on Tuesday.The report by the
Asia-group" class="entity-link entity-organization" data-entity-id="33403" data-entity-type="organization">
Asia Group thinktank concluded that
China had weathered the storm of the
global commodities crisis resulting from the closure of the Middle Eastern waterway, and also stood to gain from the economic and geopolitical trends sparked by the wider conflict.
Iran virtually closed the strait, a vital waterway through which much of the world’s oil and gas flows, after the US and Israel launched joint strikes on 28 February, targeting government and military sites and killing
Iran’s supreme leader,
Ali Khamenei. The ensuing crisis has sent global energy prices soaring, with
Asia particularly exposed.The report noted that before the strait’s closure, roughly 80% of the oil and nearly 90% of the liquefied natural gas transiting the waterway was destined for Asian markets, along with a significant share of other critical commodities.The report looked at
Asia’s largest economies –
China,
India,
Japan and
South Korea – as well as emerging markets across south-east
Asia. The researchers mapped the economic and political repercussions of the crisis and its impacts across key sectors including manufacturing, energy and agriculture.They concluded that
China was a clear winner from the crisis caused by
Donald Trump’s foray into the Middle East.The country’s large stockpiles of oil and the hugely ambitious rollout of renewable energy mean it has been less exposed to the energy shock than other countries.How big oil is cashing in on
Iran war – The LatestChina has long maintained strategic reserves of energy, and last year took advantage of cheap prices to build up even bigger stockpiles. Its crude imports grew from 11.1m barrels a day to 11.6m in 2025, with over 80% of that increase being sent to stockpiles, according to analysis by Erica Downs, a senior research scholar at the Centre on Global Energy Policy. As of January,
China had enough stockpiled to cover 104 days of imports at the 2025 level.The country has also been building massive amounts of renewable energy infrastructure in recent years. Last year it installed 315GW of new solar capacity, more than half of the world’s new solar. The year before, it added 277GW. Beijing is aiming for half of
China’s energy to come from non-fossil sources by 2030, with the share from wind and solar reaching 30%, up from 22% in 2025.Although
China’s energy mix is still largely based on coal, which accounts for more than 50%, renewables’ share is increasing rapidly.The
Asia-group" class="entity-link entity-organization" data-entity-id="33403" data-entity-type="organization">
Asia Group’s report said: “With 1.4 terawatts of operating renewable capacity already online and a reported 90-110 days of crude import cover in reserve,
China weathered the initial shock better than any regional peer.”
China has also benefited from other countries reacting to the crisis by accelerating its clean energy buildout. Beijing dominates the global supply chain in solar and other clean technology industries and in recent years has been pushing much of this production overseas at low prices, to the chagrin of western leaders worried about their own industries.
China’s electric vehicle exports soared by more than 110% in May compared with the previous year, while solar shipments in April increased by 60%.Electric vehicles waiting for export on the Hangzhou section of the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal on Monday. Photograph: VCG/Getty ImagesBeijing has called for a ceasefire in the Middle East, and when Trump visited in May and met
China’s president, Xi Jinping, he claimed the two countries were united in wanting to find a settlement. But the
Asia-group" class="entity-link entity-organization" data-entity-id="33403" data-entity-type="organization">
Asia Group report noted: “The crisis allows Beijing to cast the
United States as the destabilising actor whose Middle East entanglements impose costs on the world.”There are some risks to
China from the instability. Drew Thompson, a senior fellow at the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore, said: “It’s tempting to see any loss of credibility in the US as a benefit for
China, but that’s not necessarily the case for Beijing, which does not want to supplant Washington as a Middle East hegemon or provider of security for the region.”Wen-Ti Sung, a non-resident fellow with the Atlantic Council’s Global
China Hub, based in Taiwan, said the crisis could also make Beijing think twice about a future military assault on Taiwan because it showed the difficulty of navigating ships through hostile territory.The
Asia-group" class="entity-link entity-organization" data-entity-id="33403" data-entity-type="organization">
Asia Group’s report concluded: “Ultimately Beijing views the pain points not as existential threats, but as challenges to be managed and even opportunities to be exploited.”