US Supreme Court says Rastafarian man shaved by prison guards can’t sue

The high court has upheld a ruling that prisoners cannot sue prison staff for money damages under religious liberties law.The United States Supreme Court has determined that a Rastafarian man cannot sue prison officials who cut his dreadlocks for violating his religious beliefs.On Tuesday, the court’s conservative majority ruled that Damon Landor, a formerly incarcerated man, cannot file a lawsuit against prison staff for violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), a law meant to uphold religious liberties for those behind bars.Recommended Stories list of 3 itemslist 1 of 3US Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on green card holder caselist 2 of 3US Supreme Court OKs ExxonMobil lawsuit over Castro-era property seizurelist 3 of 3US Supreme Court eases restrictions on drug users owning firearmsend of listWriting for the majority, Justice Neil Gorsuch did not argue that Landor’s religious rights had not been violated.Instead, he wrote that it was improper to sue the prison officials, as they had not consented to be liable under the RLUIPA law.“Mr. Landor’s case cannot proceed against them any more than a breach of contract action might proceed against a defendant who never formed a contract,” Gorsuch wrote.The ruling upheld a lower court’s decision which found that incarcerated people cannot seek financial damages from individual employees, even in cases where their rights were violated.Landor, however, released a statement through his lawyers indicating he would continue his pursuit of justice.“I am disappointed but not defeated,” Landor said in a statement from his lawyers. “What happened to me violated my faith and my dignity. I will continue pursuing accountability. What happened to me should not happen to anyone else.”Landor served a five-month prison term in Louisiana in 2020. He is Rastafarian, a religion that requires him to grow his hair as a sign of his faith.As he entered the prison system, he carried a copy of a 2017 appeals court ruling that found that cutting a religious prisoner’s dreadlocks violated federal law.