Deal comes after months of
US-brokered direct talks, but
Israel continues to occupy Lebanese land.US Secretary of State
Marco Rubio, centre, speaks with Lebanese ambassador
Nada Hamadeh at the State Department in Washington, DC, on June 26 [Ken Cedeno/Reuters]Published On 26 Jun 2026At the signing ceremony for the
Framework Agreement between
Israel and
Lebanon in Washington on Friday,
United States Secretary of State
Marco Rubio described the deal as “the beginning of the beginning”.“There is a lot of work ahead,” Rubio said. “Today is the first step. The first step is sometimes the hardest one.”Recommended Stories list of 3 itemslist 1 of 3Hezbollah demands
Israel leave
Lebanon ‘unconditionally’ amid talks in USlist 2 of 3US announces
Framework Agreement between
Israel and Lebanonlist 3 of 3Iran slams the GCC and the US for ‘interventionist’ statement: What we knowend of listThe US had brokered the direct talks, which began in April, and it is also a signatory to what is officially a trilateral agreement.But the wording of the agreement has not been officially published, and
Israel continues to occupy a large area of southern
Lebanon.
Israel, meanwhile, also appears to be signalling that it will continue its attacks in the country if it deems them necessary.The country has been at war with the pro-Iranian Lebanese group
Hezbollah since October 2023, with varying levels of intensity, and has killed more than 4,000 people in
Lebanon since March.What do we know about the contents of the agreement?Rubio said in a statement that the deal “establishes a clear and structured process to restore
Lebanon’s sovereignty, disarm [
Hezbollah] and dismantle its terrorist infrastructure, and enable
Israel to return to its borders once that threat to its citizens is removed”.“It also creates a trilateral Military Coordination Group for
Lebanon … allowing the two sides to implement this Framework,” he added.Meanwhile, Lebanese Prime Minister
Nawaf Salam wrote on social media that the agreement “aims to achieve
Israel’s withdrawal from all Lebanese territories”.But he added that the deal was essentially a continuation of past agreements and United Nations resolutions that stipulate that the Lebanese military maintains authority over all parts of
Lebanon — a challenge to both
Israel and
Hezbollah.News reports have emerged, revealing further details from the
Framework Agreement.The Israeli newspaper
Haaretz said that
Israel had agreed to withdraw from two areas in southern
Lebanon. One of the areas is north of the “Yellow Line”, a military zone
Israel controls that stretches roughly 10 kilometres into
Lebanon, and the other is inside the Yellow Line.The news outlet Axios also reported similar details. It identified the areas as “pilot projects” where the Lebanese army would deploy once Israeli forces withdraw from that area.Al Jazeera has not been able to confirm those details, but the Reuters news agency said that Israeli and Lebanese officials had denied the reports.What is the military situation in
Lebanon?
Israel has destroyed villages and towns across southern
Lebanon, where it has focused most of its attacks.It has also struck the Lebanese capital Beirut and the eastern Bekaa Valley in recent weeks, claiming to target
Hezbollah.A ceasefire agreed during previous
Israel-
Lebanon talks in Washington has led to a partial de-escalation in the fighting, but
Israel has not fully stopped its attacks and continues to occupy approximately one-fifth of
Lebanon.On Friday, the day the
Framework Agreement was signed, an Israeli air raid reportedly killed two people in the town of Mayfadoun, and
Israel also conducted air strikes in the town of Nabatieh al-Fawqa. The Israeli military also dropped leaflets demanding residents leave in the town of al-Mansouri.
Hezbollah and Israeli fighters have also continued to fight periodically.However, a Lebanese military source has denied to Al Jazeera that
Israel has taken control of the Ali al-Taher heights area of southern
Lebanon, insisting that there had been no Israeli advance.Will the
Framework Agreement lead to peace?Ultimately, this is a bifurcated question:
Israel is in conflict with both the Lebanese state and
Hezbollah.While
Israel and
Lebanon are neighbours, they have been in a state of war since 1948, when
Israel was formed on historic Palestine.
Israel has since conducted several wars against
Lebanon, and it occupied parts of southern
Lebanon between 1982 and 2000.Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has framed the war on
Lebanon as being about protecting northern
Israel from attack. He insists that the current deal will not see Israeli forces withdraw from
Lebanon “as long as
Hezbollah is not disarmed and as long as there is a threat to the State of
Israel”.For his part, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun said that the
Framework Agreement was the “first step on the path towards
Lebanon restoring its sovereignty over all its territory”.He also called it “the beginning of the path for displaced people to return to their liberated towns under the sovereignty of the Lebanese state”.
Hezbollah was not present for the talks in Washington, DC. And yet, it also has a say in any deal, even if it isn’t present at the negotiating table.The group has insisted that
Israel must leave
Lebanon unconditionally, and Secretary-General Naim Qassem has said that there should be “no normalisation” with
Israel.
Hezbollah’s position is that
Israel cannot be trusted and that it has to keep its weapons to fight
Israel if the Lebanese army is unable to. A
Hezbollah member of parliament, Hassan Fadlallah, said that any attempt by the Lebanese army to enforce a Washington-brokered agreement would lead to “civil war”.Meanwhile, Israeli officials — including Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich — have suggested that
Israel could be staying in
Lebanon for the long term.“We are there until
Hezbollah disarms, and I think also beyond that, because we need defendable borders,” Smotrich said earlier this week.