'This has got me worried': Iranians fear what comes next after US strike on Karaj bridge

Iran's tallest bridge, the B1 highway bridge near Tehran, collapsed following reports of U.S. airstrikes, according to President Trump. The strike, reportedly aimed at disrupting drone and missile supply lines, resulted in civilian casualties. Trump urged Iran to negotiate a deal to avoid further escalation. Iranian state TV reported the bridge was struck twice and warned of retaliation, claiming the military identified bridges in American-allied Middle Eastern nations as potential targets. These nations include Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Abu Dhabi and the Jordan-West Bank region. Iran is reportedly considering plans to rebuild the bridge.

On April 2, 2026, a US-Israeli strike targeted the B1 bridge in Karaj, west of Tehran, Iran. The attack resulted in the deaths of at least two people and injuries to several others. The B1 bridge, a major highway link described as the tallest in the Middle East, sustained significant damage. The bridge, located near Tehran, was newly opened and scheduled for an official inauguration. Iranian authorities have confirmed the strike and casualties.

Donald Trump claimed responsibility for the destruction of Iran's largest bridge, the B1 suspension bridge between Tehran and Karaj, following a threat to bomb the country if a deal to end the ongoing war was not reached. The incident, which resulted in two reported deaths, involved the bridge collapsing after being struck twice. Trump posted footage of the destruction online, warning of further actions if a settlement was not achieved. This attack is one of several confirmed strikes in Iran this week, including a major strike on a missile base in Isfahan. These events occur amidst a five-week-long war initiated by the US and Israel on February 28th, with Trump stating the US is nearing completion of its strategic objectives.

In a primetime address on Wednesday, Donald Trump discussed the US-Israeli military operation in Iran, stating that its core strategic objectives were "nearing completion" after one month of war. He projected the conflict would last an additional two to three weeks. However, the BBC's Chief International Correspondent, Lyse Doucet, noted that Trump's timelines regarding the war have been inconsistent. The address, intended to provide clarity on the situation, left several questions unanswered about the future of the conflict. The location of the address was not specified in the article.

On Wednesday, April 1, 2026, President Donald Trump addressed the nation from the White House regarding the ongoing war in Iran. He assured Americans that military objectives would be completed "shortly" and requested more time from a skeptical public. Trump's speech aimed to calm jittery markets amid rising oil prices and falling Asian stocks, although he vowed continued pressure on Iran. While dialing back recent aggressive rhetoric, he offered no specifics on negotiations that could lead to a resolution, only promising to "finish the job." The address comes as Iran continues to inflict damage on Gulf neighbors and U.S. bases.

Yemen's Houthis have entered the regional conflict between Iran and its enemies, the US and Israel, with a confirmed attack on Israel in March 2026. While the Houthis align with Iran's broader strategy as part of the "Axis of Resistance," they maintain a degree of independence in their decision-making. Iran provides support, expertise, and political cover, but the Houthis prioritize their domestic objectives in Yemen, where they control Sanaa and much of the northwest. This allows them to leverage regional escalations to serve their own project within Yemen, without directly mirroring the actions of other Iran-backed groups like Hezbollah. The Houthis' relationship with Iran is an unequal partnership that allows them to act in their own interests.

In an open letter to the American public, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian questioned the benefits of the ongoing US-Israeli war on Iran. Published on April 1, 2026, the letter urges Americans to critically examine whose interests are being served by the conflict. Pezeshkian refuted portrayals of Iran as a threat, citing previous attacks during nuclear negotiations and emphasizing the detrimental effects of targeting Iranian infrastructure. He argued that such actions constitute war crimes, destabilize the region, and damage the United States' global standing. The letter was released shortly after President Trump threatened further military action against Iran if the Strait of Hormuz remained closed.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian addressed the American public in an unusual open letter on Wednesday, criticizing the US's actions against Iran. He described the conflict as costly and futile for the United States, arguing that confrontation is less beneficial than peace. Pezeshkian highlighted Iran's historical resilience against aggressors, suggesting the US's approach is misguided. He questioned the benefits of the conflict for the American people and the justification for it, implying there was no real threat from Iran. The letter is seen as an attempt to influence US public opinion and indirectly push for de-escalation.

Donald Trump has expressed interest in seizing Iranian oil, specifically targeting Kharg Island, a key export hub. This statement, made amidst ongoing conflict between the US and Iran, has drawn criticism and raised questions about the true motives behind the war. Experts suggest Trump's desire reflects a belief in "fossil-fuel imperialism," where the US is entitled to resources it desires. Trump has threatened to obliterate Iran's energy infrastructure, including Kharg Island, if the Strait of Hormuz is not reopened and a peace deal reached quickly. Iran has attacked a crude oil tanker anchored at Dubai port. Trump is expected to provide an update on the Iran war on Wednesday.

China and Pakistan jointly proposed a five-point plan on Tuesday aimed at de-escalating the Iran crisis, calling for an immediate ceasefire and the start of peace negotiations. Chinese analysts view the plan as a practical step towards renewed diplomacy. This initiative signals an effort to influence the post-war Middle East order, particularly as the traditional US-led security structure faces challenges. Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia have formed a united regional diplomatic front, seeking to establish a distinct peace-broker channel separate from Western efforts. The China-Pakistan plan emerged after discussions in Beijing between the foreign ministers of both countries. The collective goal is to prevent further escalation and the potential disruption of global energy routes.

In March 2026, amidst an escalating US-Israel war on Iran, Pakistan offered to host peace talks between Iran and the United States. Pakistan's Foreign Minister convened a meeting with Saudi Arabia, Turkiye, and Egypt, expressing Islamabad's readiness to broker meaningful discussions. Given Pakistan's close ties with both Tehran and Washington, it is seen as a potential facilitator for ending the conflict that began the previous month. Experts suggest this initiative could mark the beginning of a diplomatic effort to achieve a peaceful resolution. The feasibility of reaching a peace deal was discussed with analysts including a former Pakistani UN representative and directors from the International Crisis Group and TEPAV.

In March 2026, amidst a month-long war with Iran that disrupted global markets and increased energy prices, former US President Donald Trump urged countries to either purchase oil from the United States or take it from the Strait of Hormuz. Trump criticized nations like the United Kingdom and France for not supporting US-Israeli strikes against Iran. He suggested these countries, facing jet fuel shortages due to the Strait's closure, should assert themselves and seize oil, implying the US would no longer provide assistance. Trump also cited France's refusal to allow military supply flights to Israel as further justification for his stance. His statements were made via a Truth Social post.

Pakistan and China have jointly proposed a five-part peace plan for the Middle East, following a meeting between Pakistani and Chinese foreign ministers in Beijing. Pakistan is seeking to play a peacemaking role between the United States and Iran amidst ongoing conflict. The proposal emphasizes dialogue and diplomacy as the solution, calling for an immediate ceasefire and protection of waterways. Pakistan has been actively communicating with leaders from the US, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Egypt, positioning itself as a mediator and offering Islamabad as a location for peace talks. China, while maintaining neutrality, has expressed concern for the safety of its oil tankers and called for a ceasefire.

On day 32 of the US-Israeli attacks on Iran, air strikes continue in Tehran and Isfahan. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that US war objectives would be achieved in weeks, while communication with Tehran continues through intermediaries. President Trump threatened to destroy Iran's oil export hub and energy infrastructure if a deal isn't reached soon. Iran's parliament approved tolls on vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz, effectively closed by the war, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps confirmed the death of its naval commander in an Israeli strike. Iran also launched its 87th regional attack in a month, signaling continued naval strength despite US claims.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian stated Iran has the "will" to end the ongoing war with the US and Israel, seeking guarantees against future conflict. This statement followed recent strikes on Iran and threats from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to retaliate against US tech companies, including Google, Meta, and Apple, for alleged complicity in the assassinations of Iranian leaders. The Guards threatened to target these companies' units if further assassinations occur. The war, initiated on February 28 by US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with the killing of Iran's supreme leader, has triggered regional retaliation. Trump's stance on further escalation, including potential ground troop deployment, versus negotiation remains unclear.

In March 2026, US President Donald Trump threatened to seize or destroy Iran's Kharg Island, its main oil export hub, if Tehran does not agree to a deal with the US. Nearly all of Iran's oil exports depend on Kharg Island. The potential takeover, possibly involving ground troops, is part of escalating tensions between the US and Iran. Analysts suggest the US may be trying to gain leverage in negotiations with Iran by threatening its oil exports. The strategic importance of Kharg Island raises concerns about the potential impact on the conflict and global energy markets.

Following a hypothetical Iran war, the US may reassess its relationship with NATO due to a perceived lack of support during the conflict. Secretary of State Marco Rubio expressed disappointment with NATO members for allegedly denying the US access to military bases. This follows previous criticism from President Trump, who questioned the alliance's strength and commitment. Rubio indicated that the US would re-evaluate its engagement with NATO if the alliance only focuses on defending Europe while denying the US basing rights. The US, along with a coalition, aims to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, which has been effectively closed since late February, either through Iranian compliance or international intervention.

European officials report that Iran is pressuring the Houthi rebels in Yemen to prepare for renewed attacks on Red Sea shipping. This action is reportedly contingent on further escalation by the US against Iran. Houthi leaders are considering more aggressive actions after launching ballistic missiles at Israel. Internal divisions exist within the Houthi leadership regarding the extent of aggression. While the Houthis announced they would continue military operations until US-Israeli attacks on Iran and its proxies cease, they did not explicitly state they would target Red Sea vessels. US and Saudi Arabian officials believe the Houthis currently aim to avoid further escalation and attacks on American and Saudi assets.

In a March 31, 2026, interview with Al Jazeera, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio detailed the United States' stance on Iran. Rubio stated that US objectives regarding Iran would be achieved "within weeks, not months." He revealed that discussions between Iranian parties and the US were ongoing, primarily through intermediaries. Rubio warned that the Strait of Hormuz would be reopened following the conclusion of a military operation. He also asserted that Iran must verifiably abandon any nuclear weapons aspirations. The interview provides insight into the US's strategy and timeline concerning Iran.

Iran has accused the United States of secretly planning a ground assault while publicly seeking negotiations, amidst ongoing tensions. This accusation comes as the conflict, which has already caused significant global energy disruption, enters its second month. President Trump stated in an interview that he would prefer to seize Iranian oil and suggested that taking Kharg Island, a crucial Iranian export hub, would be easy. The situation is developing, and the potential seizure of Iranian crude oil is significant for Cuba, which is currently experiencing severe fuel shortages due to a lack of imports. Cuba's president has stated that the country has not received any oil imports for three months.

In late March 2026, amidst escalating US-Israeli attacks on Iran, Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf accused the United States of plotting a ground invasion, despite ongoing negotiations. This accusation came as Iran experienced power outages in Tehran and surrounding areas, attributed to attacks on electricity infrastructure. While the cause of the attacks remains unclear, they occurred amidst President Trump's threats to target Iranian energy infrastructure if a deal to end the war was not reached. The Pentagon is reportedly preparing for potential limited ground operations in Iran, and the US is deploying thousands of additional troops to the Middle East. The US-Israeli war on Iran has now entered its fifth week.

In March 2026, US President Donald Trump expressed his desire to seize Iran's oil by taking control of Kharg Island, a key Iranian oil export hub. He stated that some within the US opposed the plan, but he dismissed them as "stupid people." The US has deployed Marines to the Middle East amidst ongoing tensions, including a US-Israel war on Iran. US officials have discussed the possibility of seizing Kharg Island, which is vital to Iran's energy sector. In response, Iran threatened to retaliate with attacks on the infrastructure of a regional country assisting the US.

In an interview with Al Jazeera on March 30, 2026, Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that regional stability hinges on dismantling Iran's capacity to launch missiles and drones. Rubio asserted that Iran has utilized these weapons to attack neighboring countries' infrastructure and civilian populations. He emphasized the necessity of eliminating this capability to ensure peace and security in the region. The interview focused on the perceived threat posed by Iran's missile and drone program and its impact on neighboring nations. Rubio's statement highlights the US government's stance on addressing Iran's military capabilities.

Donald Trump threatened to "obliterate" Iran's energy grid and water plants if a ceasefire is not reached "shortly" in the ongoing conflict instigated by the US and Israel. This threat, made via social media, includes targeting Kharg Island, a major oil export facility. Trump claims to be in "serious discussions" with a "more reasonable regime" in Tehran to reach a deal, including reopening the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has described US peace proposals as "excessive" and acknowledged receiving a 15-point proposal from the Trump administration after talks with other nations. The White House indicated Trump would seek financial assistance from Arab countries to cover the war costs, while also expressing a preference to "take the oil in Iran," potentially requiring a US troop seizure of Kharg Island.

The article discusses the possibility of the U.S. seizing Iran's Kharg Island, its main oil export terminal, located in the northern Gulf. President Trump has indicated he may send troops to take control of the island, through which 90% of Iran's oil exports pass. The potential operation aims to pressure Iran into relinquishing control of the Strait of Hormuz and conceding to U.S. demands. The U.S. has nearly 5,000 Marines and 2,000 paratroopers in the region, who could potentially be used in an airborne or amphibious assault. However, Iran has reinforced its defenses on Kharg Island and warned of retaliation, making any such operation highly risky.

According to U.S., Gulf, and Israeli officials, Gulf allies, including Saudi Arabia and the UAE, are privately lobbying President Trump to persist in the war against Iran. These allies believe that the month-long U.S.-led bombing campaign has not sufficiently weakened Tehran. The Gulf states initially expressed discontent over the lack of advance notice regarding the U.S.-Israeli attack. They also felt the U.S. had previously disregarded their warnings concerning the war. The Gulf allies are advocating for continued military action to achieve a more decisive defeat of Iran. The events described in the article are dated in March of 2026.

As Donald Trump plans a trip to China in May, a surge in US troops in the Middle East suggests a potential for a drawn-out, low-intensity conflict with Iran. Recent reports indicate the US has deployed several hundred Army Rangers and Navy Seals to the region, bringing the total number of American troops to over 50,000. This deployment provides Trump with military options, such as securing the Strait of Hormuz, seizing Kharg Island, or extracting enriched uranium from Iran. Analysts believe a full-scale US ground invasion of Iran is unlikely, suggesting the US is trying to avoid a costly, protracted war. The troop increase and potential actions are viewed in the context of Trump's upcoming visit to China.

One month after the US and Israel began military operations against Iran on February 28, 2026, Yemen's Houthi rebels have opened a new front by attacking Israel. The Houthis launched missile and drone attacks on Israel, which were reportedly intercepted, pledging further action in support of allies. This escalation raises concerns about the conflict spiraling out of control, as Iran has already disrupted traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. The Houthis' involvement also threatens to disrupt Red Sea traffic via the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, potentially impacting Israeli trade. The US anticipates concluding its military operations against Iran within weeks, even as further deployments arrive in the region.

Recent reports indicate heightened tensions in the Middle East, with explosions reported in Tehran. Yemen's Houthis are reportedly increasing the risk of war with Iran. According to Iranian state media, Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf stated that the U.S. is secretly planning a ground attack while publicly expressing diplomatic intentions. Ghalibaf, a former IRGC commander, believes Iran is in a major world war and must prepare for a difficult path. The IDF claims to have conducted airstrikes across Tehran, targeting Iranian command centers and weapons sites. A report indicates that US and Israeli airstrikes in Iran between February 28 and March 23 resulted in at least 1,443 civilian deaths, including at least 217 children.

Houthi rebels in Yemen, backed by Iran, launched missile attacks on Israel on Saturday, marking their entry into the ongoing Middle East conflict. The Houthis claimed to target sensitive Israeli military sites, while Israel reported intercepting a missile. This action raises concerns about potential disruptions to global shipping through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait off the Red Sea, a crucial passage for approximately 12% of global trade. The Houthis, controlling much of northern Yemen, are a key part of Iran's "Axis of Resistance," and their involvement could exacerbate the existing tensions and further impact international trade routes. The Israeli military stated they are preparing for a multifront war.

Diplomats from Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Egypt convened in Pakistan on Sunday to discuss ending the month-long conflict in the Middle East between Iran, the US, and Israel. The war, triggered by US and Israeli strikes on Iran, has resulted in over 3,000 deaths and threatens global oil supplies due to Iran's control of the Strait of Hormuz. The US and Israel are not participating in the Islamabad talks, but the US has reportedly offered Iran a 15-point peace proposal via Pakistan. The meetings aim to establish direct dialogue between the US and Iran, who have primarily communicated through mediators during the conflict, which has been further complicated by the entry of Yemen's Houthi rebels.

Amidst a global energy crisis caused by the ongoing US-Israeli war on Iran, Pakistan is hosting talks in Islamabad with the foreign ministers of Turkiye, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt. The meetings, which began on Sunday, March 29, 2026, aim to de-escalate the conflict. Pakistan's Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar is attempting to build a regional bloc, potentially including Indonesia and Malaysia, to encourage diplomacy. This diplomatic push follows a phone call between Dar and his Iranian counterpart, during which the Iranian minister detailed accusations of US-Israeli attacks on Iranian infrastructure. As a confidence-building measure, Iran has agreed to allow Pakistani ships passage through the Strait of Hormuz.

Pakistan is hosting top diplomats from Saudi Arabia, Turkiye, and Egypt in Islamabad for two-day talks focused on de-escalating the conflict between the US and Iran. The meetings, led by Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, aim to foster dialogue and diplomacy as a solution to the escalating tensions. Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif spoke with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, who thanked Pakistan for its mediation efforts. Pakistan is acting as a key communicator between the US and Iran, relaying messages in an attempt to find a resolution to the conflict. The talks are considered a critical step towards finding a viable diplomatic solution.

Reports indicate the Pentagon is preparing options for potential ground operations in Iran, including special forces raids or infantry deployments. This comes as the US increases its military presence in the Middle East, with an additional 3,500 troops arriving recently, joining the roughly 50,000 already stationed in the region. Potential objectives for military action could include securing the Strait of Hormuz, seizing Iranian uranium, or targeting oil facilities. Lawmakers are debating the necessity and scope of any potential ground involvement, with Senator Lankford emphasizing the need for clear objectives and a defined exit strategy. The White House stated that the Pentagon's preparations are for optionality and do not indicate a presidential decision has been made.

The Pentagon is reportedly preparing plans for weeks of limited ground operations in Iran, potentially including raids on Kharg Island and coastal sites near the Strait of Hormuz. According to The Washington Post, the plans involve special operations and conventional infantry troops, but fall short of a full-scale invasion. These preparations come as the war in Iran stretches into its fifth week, with the US deploying additional Marines and soldiers to the Middle East, including approximately 3,500 soldiers who recently arrived on the USS Tripoli. Discussions within the administration have considered seizing Kharg Island, a key Iranian oil export hub, and raiding coastal areas to destroy weapons targeting commercial and military shipping. While the Pentagon is preparing options, it remains uncertain whether President Trump will approve any of these plans.

Chinese analysts believe the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, now in its second month, is unlikely to be prolonged despite escalating tensions. The conflict has expanded geographically, with Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen firing missiles at Israel, one of which was intercepted. The Houthis operate near the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, a critical shipping lane for Eurasian trade. Analysts warn that Houthi obstruction of this strait could significantly impact the global economy and potentially cause another increase in oil prices, which have already risen. The Houthi missile attack was reportedly issued as a warning.

Yemen's Houthi rebels launched a barrage of ballistic missiles targeting "sensitive Israeli military sites" in southern Israel on Saturday, marking their first direct strikes since the US-Israeli war on Iran began. Houthi military spokesperson Brigadier-General Yahya Saree announced the attack, stating it would continue until objectives are achieved and aggression against the resistance ceases. The Israeli military reported intercepting one missile, with sirens sounding in Beersheba and near Israel's nuclear research center. The Houthis, who have controlled Yemen's capital since 2014, had previously stayed out of the conflict, though they disrupted Red Sea shipping during the Israel-Hamas war. This attack signals a potential escalation of the broader regional conflict.

The conflict between the US-Israeli alliance and Iran has escalated with the entry of Houthi forces from Yemen, who launched missile attacks on Israeli military sites. This expansion threatens key maritime routes like the Bab al-Mandab strait, potentially amplifying the war's impact on the global economy. While Israel claims to have intercepted one missile, the Houthis vow to continue operations until aggression ceases. A meeting of Middle Eastern powers in Pakistan aims to find a regional solution, but excludes the warring parties. Attacks have also been reported on a Saudi airbase and Kuwait airport, raising concerns about further regional involvement, including potential direct intervention by Saudi Arabia if its Red Sea oil export route is threatened.

The Houthi movement in Yemen, backed by Iran, poses a significant threat to Red Sea shipping lanes. While their missile attacks on Israel have been limited, the Houthis' potential targeting of vessels in the Bab al-Mandab strait could severely disrupt global trade and energy supplies. This action, taken in support of Hamas, risks escalating tensions and further damaging the global economy, especially if coupled with Iran's actions in the Strait of Hormuz. The Houthis have previously targeted Gulf Arab neighbors and faced retaliatory strikes. Increased Houthi involvement could reignite Yemen's internal conflict and broaden the ongoing regional war. The extent of the Houthis' future actions remains uncertain.

A month into the US and Israel's war with Iran, President Trump's initial expectations of a swift resolution are unmet. Despite assassinating Iranian leaders and conducting extensive airstrikes, the Iranian regime has not collapsed, and its missile capabilities remain a regional threat. Diplomatic efforts, mediated by Pakistan, have stalled as Iran has hardened its stance against US demands. Washington seeks the dismantling of Iran's nuclear program, the surrender of its enriched uranium stockpile, the elimination of most Iranian missiles, and the cessation of support for allied militias like Hezbollah and the Houthis. The conflict continues, raising concerns about prolonged chaos in the region.

The Houthis in Yemen warned they are prepared to militarily intervene if other countries join the US and Israel in a war against Iran, or if the Red Sea is used to attack Iran. Houthi spokesperson Yahya Saree stated their "fingers are on the trigger" for direct military intervention under those circumstances. This warning raises concerns about a broader regional conflict, given the Houthis' ability to strike targets and disrupt shipping lanes. The Houthis have controlled much of Yemen since 2014 and have previously targeted vessels in the Red Sea and Israel in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza. While a truce was agreed upon in May, this new statement suggests a potential shift in Houthi involvement in the region.

In a news report published on March 27, 2026, the Houthis warned they are prepared for direct military intervention in the US-Israeli war on Iran. The Houthis stated that their "fingers are on the trigger," indicating a readiness to engage in the conflict. The report specifies that the Houthis have laid out conditions that would prompt their involvement in the war. The exact nature of these conditions was not detailed in the provided information, but the statement signals a potential escalation of the conflict in the Middle East. The Houthis' warning suggests a willingness to take military action depending on unfolding circumstances related to the US-Israeli war on Iran.

According to an intelligence source, Saudi Arabia is urging the United States to intensify its attacks on Iran, viewing the current US-Israeli campaign as a crucial opportunity to reshape the Middle East. While not currently involved militarily in the conflict that began in late February, Saudi Arabia is considering direct intervention if peace efforts fail and Iran continues its attacks. Recent Iranian drone strikes, including one targeting an oil refinery in Yanbu on the Red Sea coast, have heightened tensions. Despite possessing a pipeline to transport oil via the Red Sea, Saudi Arabia faces potential threats to its economic lifeline and from Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen. Saudi Arabia claims it is calibrating its response and preparing for potential escalation, while maintaining that it has not been pushing for war.

Yemenis fear potential economic consequences as they could be drawn into the conflict between the U.S. and Iran. While Iran's allies, such as Hezbollah, are actively involved, the Iran-allied Houthis in Yemen have not yet engaged. However, the Houthis possess the capability to target shipping in the Red Sea, and an Iranian official suggested they could destabilize the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandeb Strait if the U.S. attacks Iranian oil facilities. Analysts warn that Houthi involvement, such as blockading Bab al-Mandeb, would devastate Yemen economically and humanitarianly, and could reignite Yemen's internal conflict. Abdulsalam Mohammed suggests the Houthis would likely target energy facilities and ports in Gulf countries.